Consider 1.5 inch rope that classical philosophy today is not relevant, that it would perhaps inter

Love Drama Literature Essay Books Literary science and criticism Memoirs Poetry Prose Writers Translations Northern cats Issues Open Question Arts Art Cinema Music Performing Arts Philosophy Chat Agora Heritage Heritage Symbology Reading No history. 5 good times and in texts at North texts angle Culture Sketches
Consider 1.5 inch rope that classical philosophy today is not relevant, that it would perhaps interesting as chess, but not worth rethinking, and entanglements discussion with Aristotle, Spinoza, Leibniz today (sic) "nowhere" is repeating Marius Plečkaitis and Donato Paulausko words, at the very least naive. Classical philosophy today quite nicely exonerated, and the fundamental metaphysical issues related to space, time, free will, substance, slowly atsikovojami of the sciences, and again returned to the philosophy of the discourse. Graham Harmans even, for example, says Leibniz and Clarke have resolved the dispute concerning the time and space to the issue.
Harmans - one spekuliatyviojo realism, in 2006, was born in the continental philosophy of the movement's founders. The movement advocates a return to fundamental ontological questions and to respond to the so-called koreliacionizmui (Meillassoux term) - postkantinei philosophical position, according 1.5 inch rope to which, speaking of the reality beyond our consciousness and perception is impossible. Despite its launched attacks against koreliacionizmą, Meillassoux is a fan of this philosophy, trying to solve the problem of the reality of the correlation arguing inside the wheel. Harmans convinced that the solution is much simpler, and that philosophy today should turn into objects, instead of talking about the relationship between them.
What are these objects, as reported by the Harmans? Philosopher admits he does not have a clear answer. But it is, on the one hand, clearly indicates two dominant Western philosophy false positions 1.5 inch rope of objects in relation to, and, on the other hand, a key symptom diagnoses, preventing sober discourse on objects qua objects - the relationship between man and the world a privileged, classic klaustrofobiškąją subject and object distinction that postkantiniai philosophers (false) claim defeated, but in fact merely camouflaged the correlative connection.
Those two philosophical positions, according to the Harmans, was born in pre-Socratic philosophical systems. One of these positions is reduced to undermining the reality of objects (the Harmans term can be translated as' free-kick objects', 'free-kick objects "- 1.5 inch rope this is the smallest primary objects parts / components). Undermining philosophers considered the reality of the primary components (water (Thales), air (Aneximenes), the four primary elements (empedocles) atoms (Democritus, Leucippus)) epiphenomenon; positions which a little more difficult to clearly define the language of overmining objects - these philosophers anaksimandriškojo Apeiron followers, 1.5 inch rope claiming to speak on the initial part of ignoring 1.5 inch rope them materializuojančias, disruptors and uniting forces and change is naive. Thinkers in contemporary philosophy 1.5 inch rope undermining the most frequent analytical camp (for example, scientific positivism apologists). Overmining category we can assign 1.5 inch rope such philosophers as Nietzsche, Foucault, Badiou, Zizek, and even Deleuze. Harmans not consider these two positions 1.5 inch rope false, far - these philosophers, especially overmining philosophers, is one of his favorites, and on them he has written a number of excellent texts. It is important to emphasize here is that both the atomic structure of objects and the social context of power relations and ideology, actually exists and influences the material manifestations of our environment, necessarily acting in each of our lives. However, objects qua objects, says Harmans, exists independently of undermining and overmining objects from micro makrodeterminacijų (object qua object is autonomous, it is not 1) its atoms conglomerate of 2) social product, ie, the object qua object as if there is a secondary dimension) 1.5 inch rope . That it is possible to talk about objects qua objects, you have to get rid of the person and the world a privileged relationship. The problem is not the division between subject and object, the problem is that it is precisely this distinction 1.5 inch rope in philosophy was regarded as essential, but in fact, approved by the Harmans, instead of one of the privileged distinction between man and the world, around which revolve the philosophy would be tied to a perpetual orbit, 1.5 inch rope in fact justifies trillions of distinctions, or an infinite number of distinctions "1.
Distinction between objects - rain and sand, white paint layer and the wall of the house, the flames of burning it and cotton rags - not less significant than the distinction between me and the table or between me and surrounding me Hegelian community-based substance. Or I exist, regardless of their biological and social 1.5 inch rope existence. My biological body and my social self, moreover, is the same individual objects.
As a compromise, the philosopher si