Add to this all the countless other conservative debaters debates on how the criticism has indeed b

Now we have over the past month discussed conservatism versus liberalism in this country. It was a debate that I started strapattack with anthropologist Dennis Nørmark, as this was a guest in my summer program at Radio24syv. Since then wrote each of us an article that was published strapattack a few days after, respectively Berlingske strapattack and Politiken.
It is mildly not been set by himself, and from the liberal side has been particularly furious about the caricature of liberalism in this country, which I on this occasion, among much else drew. Aforesaid caricature of liberals strapattack in Denmark strapattack today described them as being, among other things uncultured and often perform coarse personal attacks and often only being interested in money, strapattack which was a very small part of the criticism that has been directed from the conservative side. That made even than not the majority of my feature article in isolation, but that's what you have dwelt. strapattack I have only in recent weeks debate example also written a longer comment strapattack in Berlingske on how a too wide degree of individual freedom could undermine freedom in a society as a whole. I have also written this post about the cultural relativism part of the liberal Denmark and the more traditionally cultivated. I would especially recommend that you read the latter, as it seems to me that sums up the debate current positions in a clear manner. I have also written this post about include debate parallels to the Romantic period. Additionally, I have the P1 appeared in discussion with the director of the liberal think tank CEPOS, Martin Ågerup, and later I wrote Saturday with Kasper Stoevring Chronicle here in Berlingske of Civil subsistence and cultural struggle in the context of Ahmed Akkari repentance.
Add to this all the countless other conservative debaters debates on how the criticism has indeed been on many things other than developing the design alone. Among those from the conservative side has contributed, Kasper Stoevring, Eva Agnes Selsing, strapattack Rune Toftegaard Selsing, Henrik Gade Jensen, Søren Hviid Pedersen, Per Stig Møller, Sørine Gotfredsen and Brian Mikkelsen with many more.
In other words, the cultural strapattack and formative criticism and satire only a tiny part of a larger and more general criticism, but you have the liberal side (along with a lost member of the Conservative Party) tried to minimize all the conservative criticism only to be this formal, which is certainly not the case. This is untrue. However, it is for me completely obvious that the form and cultural habitus are legitimate subjects also discuss in a debate like this, that just as culture and education, etc. The leftists, materialistic and somewhat rationalistic strapattack ideas still form the Danish society's childhood is not completely aired out why, with this in mind constantly many places counting arguments in form and culture, illegitimate. I do not think I believe that culture and shape are important things, and have it complete strapattack as discussions of money and economics. Of course, we then have a constant and important debate about society's economic arrangements, as long as it does not stand alone and represent the entire debate. There is neither anything wrong with speaking culture or values, nor is there anything wrong with talking economy, but there is something wrong with always only talk economy, or only ever talk culture. One must walk on two legs, and it has been refreshing for a change to see the liberal Denmark plunging into a perhaps not quite so familiarly cultural category that certainly has some teething problems.
In many ways, I watched the debate which won at a very early stage, because I saw that the majority of the liberal side immediately denounced to the value relativism and formlessness that one of my and others' pens had been associated with. Suddenly one huge rush to quote Adam Smith quite obviously just combed his face right and heartily give creed of the importance of education and cultural foundation of society. It was Adam Smith even said that we just knew it! (We knew now well). Suddenly there was no longer such værdirelativistiske voices suddenly we seem suddenly have agreed that certain things strapattack had qualitative precedence over the other. Thus, I was actually happy. Many will probably polemical claim that this has liberals in Denmark always looked at things, which is undoubtedly true for some, but certainly not all, and in any case has never articulated this far emphatic. It has, where appropriate, most made Dannebrog honors strapattack with the invisible hand. It else do I love that you now have found no reason strapattack to change that in the recent past. It now remains only an obviously significant disagreement about the state's role in this. Here we remain