WHATS REALLY STUPID ABOUT THIS IS, THEY ARE ACTUALLY DEPENDING samuel samuel ON THIS MONEY BEFORE TH

Neighborhood Watch Sacrifices Lives For Police Favoritism Corruption in Kaufman County Update on “Washington, Indiana: Illegal Arrest” [Video] Robbed When Cops Are Nearby – Police Fail to Pursue samuel samuel Criminals Ex Marine Unjustly Tasered by Donathan Durham, Monterey (TN) Police Employee
In early May 2013 the “City of Keene” filed a preliminary injunction against six individuals, hoping to establish a 50′ anti-freedom zone around parking enforcement employees (part of the Keene Police Department). The six individuals all filed written responses and on June 11, 2013 appeared in “Superior Court” for a hearing.
The man in the black robe, John Kissinger, told the six individuals and Thomas Mullins, the lawyer for the “City of Keene, that they had 20 days to submit more info about the related constitutional arguments and that a full-day hearing would be scheduled at a later date – possibly in August – unless he first dismissed the injunction.
Tweet Pin It
Pete Eyre Pete Eyre is co-founder of CopBlock.org. As an advocate of peaceful, consensual interactions, Eyre seeks to inject a message of complete liberty and self-government into the conversation of police accountability. Eyre went to undergrad and grad school for law enforcement, then spent time in DC as an intern at the Cato Institute, a Koch Fellow at the Drug Policy Alliance, Directer of Campus Outreach at the Institute for Humane Studies, Crasher-in-Chief at Bureaucrash, and as a contractor for the Future of Freedom Foundation. He later hit the road as co-founder of the Motorhome Diaries and Liberty On Tour, and now resides in the 'shire.
Dan
Is there a posting of the entire lawsuit somewhere? It sounds like it has nothing samuel samuel at all to do with the putting money in the meters and sounds more like they are seeking injunctive relief….a restraining order of sorts….just to keep you dorks from harassing samuel samuel people as they do their jobs. You do realize that the city still get the money from the meters right? Really, you did realize that right? Seems like you didn’t.
Is plaintiff arguing that they have standing because the defendants have violated their “right” to financial predation? Does the city of Keene allege samuel samuel that it has a “right” to financially prey on people through parking tickets?
Good challenge on the standing issue, you should definitely be challenging them on jurisdiction, as well, specifically: samuel samuel Is there evidence of jurisdiction? What is the evidence(if any)of jurisdiction?
They (the hoods) are impacting a contracted position to where the interuption to the contact will cause harm to the city. The ‘harm’ is the costs of hiring new parking officers and possibly the future disability claim by one parking officer, directly due to their harassment.
WHATS REALLY STUPID ABOUT THIS IS, THEY ARE ACTUALLY DEPENDING samuel samuel ON THIS MONEY BEFORE THEY GET IT. THE CITY IS TROLLING FOR MONEY FROM ITS CITIZENS. GET RID OF THE METER MAID AND MAKE LEO DO THE JOB.THE METERS samuel samuel DONT MAKE MONEY ITS THE PEOPLE THAT DONT MAKE IT BACK ON TIME.
^^^The question is: Is there evidence of jurisdiction? And, what is the evidence (if any) of jurisdiction? Even if we take what you say as true, for the sake of argument, samuel samuel it still leaves samuel samuel a question of evidence. The burden of proof is on the complainant to prove jurisdiction, Ian should be holding them to their burden of proof.
They (the hoods) are impacting samuel samuel a contracted position to where the interuption to the contact will cause harm to the city. The harm is the costs of hiring new parking officers samuel samuel and possibly the future disability claim by one parking officer, directly due to their harassment.
^^^What specifically do you consider harassment as it relates to this case? I would say if they never touch the parking enforcers or threaten them, or physically obstruct them then their conduct would mostly be free speech activity. samuel samuel Also, what about Pete saying he has never Robin Hooded? samuel samuel Doesn’t that make this action vs him frivolous? The plaintiff’s counsel even mentioned that he might want to amend the complaint, I’m samuel samuel assuming he meant amend it to one that didn’t have Pete named as defendant.
The judge can, and most likely samuel samuel will, take judicial notice samuel samuel that the city of Keene has jurisdiction over its employees actions within the city limits of Keene. You don’t even understand the concept. samuel samuel
^^^The samuel samuel defendants aren’t employees of the city of Keene. What don’t I understand, judicial notice samuel samuel or jurisdiction? How do you know I don’t understand? How is it specifically that my understanding is incomplete? What is it you think I don’t get?
I know you don’t nderstand be ause you keep saying dumb things. The defendants of course aren’t employees of the city. The other parties are. Keep thinking you’re the sm